Technology at my school
begins with the county initiative on technology. One of the strategic goals of
the county is to integrate technology into all subject areas. Of course, this
is an excellent goal on the surface. The problem arises when you dig deeper
into the county initiative. I looked at the technology plan for the county, and
it was dated 2006-2009. This is very troublesome because technology changes so
much that it is very difficult to have a plan that is so outdated. I think the
county has an excellent goal of getting teachers to incorporate technology in
the curriculum. The problem is the plan starts and ends with the goal. Even
though the county has a very specific and worthwhile goal, they have little or
no plan on how to achieve the goal. With this type of planning, there is little
continuity between schools in how to achieve the goal. The goal is doomed to
fail because there is no specific means to achieving it.
As for individual schools and technology, each school is
left to their own as to what technology to purchase and how to provide training
in reference to the technology. The county and individual schools have a lot of
technology that is available for use. Having technology is a very good initial
step. The problem at my school is that there is very little training in regard
to the technology that is accessible. Another problem is schools have different
types of technology at their respective schools. So, once again, there is
little continuity between schools. As for my school, we have an abundance of technology
available. The obstacle is that teachers within the school are at different
levels on how to plan for and how to use the technology. For example, we have
student response systems in our school that can be utilized by teachers on a
check-out basis. Some teachers use these faithfully, while other teachers do
not even know how to use them. The question arises as to what good is
technology if it can’t even be used? I think the major problem lies in having consistency
in two areas across the county.
First, schools should all have the same type of
technology available. The county needs to put a strategic plan in place as to
what technology should be utilized in all schools. I think the plan should
differentiate between elementary, middle, and high school, since students on
these levels have different needs in terms of technology. Secondly, there needs
to be mandatory training at the county level. The training needs to be held at
strategic times. The best time to train teachers is at the beginning of the
school year. When training is provided at the end of the school year, teachers
never get the chance to use the technology in the classroom. The training is
forgotten over the summer. Consistency is the key when it comes to incorporating
technology on a county-wide level. Consistency in available technology and
training will help the county to realize their goal in terms of technology.
Finally, a plan has to be put into place to ensure teachers are using
technology. The county has to inspect what they expect.
At my school there is plenty of technology available to
teachers if the wish to use it. Once again the problem lies in the training.
Many teachers are not comfortable enough to incorporate technology into their
lessons. The media specialist does the best that she can with assisting
teachers with technology. She offers some training, but it is not mandatory.
Teachers do not take advantage of the training that is offered. I think that
mandatory training needs to be introduced. I also believe that there has be
different levels of training available. Not all teachers are on the same level
when it comes to technology, therefore, they should not be offered the same
training. There needs to be differentiated training for teachers. My school
system spends an inordinate amount of money on technology, but offers little or
no training. I think it would be wise to hire a technology specialist for each
school who could collaborate with the media specialist to offer staff
development at each school. In addition, this technology specialist could show
teachers how to use technology in their classrooms. Schools spend a lot of
money on technology without a plan on how to integrate the technology. Why have
technology if it isn’t being used to it full potential?
Matthew, it was a good idea to take a look at your school district’s technology plan when considering the direction your district hoped to go relating to technology, and I anticipate that many districts fall into the same category as your’s; a plan without steps needed to reach the end goal. Focus definitely changed when the recession hit. Money was too tight, so technology plans suffered in order to keep teachers employed when possible. Hopefully focus will return to funding technology use and training as state tax revenues increase with the economy. Education needs more emphasis on creativity and problem solving and less emphasis on standardized test scores! I also think each school needs a technology specialist like you mentioned, if we are going to be serious about incorporating tech into everything in our schools.
ReplyDelete